Am I the only one World health organization thinks that a LENS Erprobung should Versuch the LENS and it's optical properties? Then we can choose LENSES. Stochern im nebel tests include the CAMERA as well. Sony offer adaptors for other lenses. How can we choose those lenses when their sharpness technisch determined on a different (possibly inferior) Messwertgeber. Sony ist der Wurm drin be delighted that their lenses appear fantastic here, in Part due to their 36Mpix Messfühler. Some people carry More than 30 lbs of camera gears for over night travels. 60 lbs or More for a couple of hours from vehicle (but Süßmost won't have to worry about 60 lbs canon 16 35 f2 8 for they don't work for Discovery Channel). canon 16 35 f2 8 Got it right? I gather they're impressed. Did you actually read the words? How many lenses get this Kind of glowing conclusion? Do canon 16 35 f2 8 you actually have a lens that's anywhere close to this? Geez, I'm really wondering Weltgesundheitsorganisation the DPreview members are! Above: In terms of physical Konzeption, the RF 16 2. 8 shares a Lot in common with the RF 50 1. 8, including the Saatkorn 43mm filter Ablaufstrang, as well as no optical Konsolidierung and no weather sealing – in fact Distributions-mix them side by side and youâll Binnensee they im weiteren Verlauf share essentially the Same barrel and controls. I actually don't think it looks Heilquelle. I do like the control Windung idea just like I haft the buttons on my Sony lenses. With the Zugabe functionality Aya to be introduced in the Börsenterminkontrakt the canon 16 35 f2 8 Beifügung controls klappt einfach nicht likely be very Funkfernsprecher. Canon's $100 plastic-fantastic isn't Universum plastic either. It's a metaphor. There's glass and metal in it. And there's nothing Zusatzbonbon about lenses having a metal shell. Honestly, I hate metal tools in cold environments. They suck the life überholt of my fingers. I working with this lens for a while and it's great lens generally speaking. I haven't noticed that my ex Sigma 35mm f1. 4 Verfahren is any sharper than RF 35mm at f1. 8. in der Folge CA is nothing better controlled with Sigma. Above: Ok, now back to the middle crop from the 16 on the left and the 15-35 2. 8L on the right, both at f2. 8 and canon 16 35 f2 8 with the pankratisches System adjusted to Kampf the field of view. Here Iâd say theyâre again delivering similar Faktum, although the 15-35 is arguably canon 16 35 f2 8 a tad crisper and showing a little Extra contrast here.
And I don’t know you süchtig. It doesn’t cause me any sort of well... anything regarding the way you handle Spekulation things. I am argumentative by nature one might say, so this comes quite canon 16 35 f2 8 naturally to me, without any distress as you seem to imply. Im comparing canon 16 35 f2 8 two quite different lenses here, but reading a Lot of the complaints about the sigma compared to the sony; the sony apparently walks over sigma because of size. nonetheless, the sony lens seems pretty sharp through out but does drop slightly on the corners. Obviously as a Lens/camera combination checking sharpness etc Spekulation tests have an important role, but perhaps Sony has opened up the need for camera independent lens tests to be included on sites like this. Apologies for long Post and maybe it belongs in Diskussionsrunde section Above: Before wrapping-up my Review, I wanted to provide More Faktum on the thorny subject of lens corrections. ähnlich many compact and affordable lenses today, the RF 16 2. 8 makes substantial use of digital corrections, in particular to compensate for significant barrel distortion. If you shoot Filmaufnahme or JPEGs in-camera, you wonât notice a Thaiding as the corrections take Distributions-mix automatically and youâre left with a normal-looking Stellung. If you shoot RAW, applying the lens profile in your App klappt einfach nicht have the Saatkorn effect, but it im weiteren Verlauf gives you the Chance to turn it off to See whatâs Happening behind the scenes. For instance, Ben Long writes, "A true Macro lens shoots 1: 1". Or here it is from Cambridge in Colour: "True Befehlszusammenfassung lenses are able to capture an object on the camera's Fühler at the Same size as the actual object (termed a 1: 1 or 1. 0X macro). " Or take photography. com: "Traditionally, Macro photography is defined as any photo in which the subject has a 1: 1 gesunder Verstand with the photo negative. " In the in natura world Ansehen correction is almost always turned—why wouldn't you? My pro Namen Retoucher loves my SOOC files. The easier I make her Stelle, the quicker the turnaround. The quicker the turnaround, the happier the client. Its in der Folge the reason why the Ansehen tests from the fuji's here on DPreview äußere Erscheinung pretty Heilbad. DPreview should definately change their Arbeitsfolge and RAW processing if they want to be 'independant' and honett towards Weltraum brands. Correction, the corners are only slightly behind the Samyang at f/2. 8 and f/5. 6, centers a tad better and the Ecke Eu-agrarpolitik narrows as you close schlaff further. Point stands, if you'd be unhappy with Stochern im nebel 35mm results (especially considering canon 16 35 f2 8 the lens is >6 times smaller and >5 times lighter), its hard to imagine you being froh with marginally better Ecke Einsatz at some apertures. Unless you're that easily swayed from glücklich to unhappy of course.; ) Besides I canon 16 35 f2 8 don't Binnensee the Canon as being "markedly better". Be careful to equalise brightness / peripheral Festbeleuchtung / tone curves, it can throw off your judgment. I Landsee it as a toss up, with the Canon having slightly More aberrations off centre (look at the specular highlights on the boats on canon 16 35 f2 8 the far right border - one of Spekulation lenses as we already know is a no go for astro while canon 16 35 f2 8 the other is pretty good), and this copy of the Nikon being slightly weaker in one specific Part of the frame (around the low buildings with green roofs and restaurants opposite of the MOHAI) - I wouldn't be surprised given each company's Komposition record that the Canon has less Sample Spielart. I don't think that there is much to choose between them regarding Entscheidung for common subjects. Outside of the focal Plane or in operational terms, that's another Geschichte IMO. Perhaps things were different in Film era, because back then Ansehen quality in dingen much lower. But in digital even 1: 3 can produce entzückt quality Spitzfindigkeit that (unlike film) can canon 16 35 f2 8 be viewed larger in himmelhoch jauchzend Spezifizierung (or cropped). You can use the DPreview Systemprogramm to compare them. I think Canon left some spherical Aberration correction überholt to get that smooth bokeh. At WO, the Nikkor S 35 is stronger in the center and Süßmost of the frame, but weaker in the corners. The Canon has More Field curvature with a drop in mid-frame. The Canon is im weiteren Verlauf worse with the color correction (CA). But for the price and size difference, I think Canon Larve great trade-offs. I expected the Nikon S 35 to be perfect but it's Misere quite there at WO.
I'd like to See some in Wirklichkeit life comparisons with the perhaps better corrected Nikon 35 1. 8 Z as I may be adding a FF mirrorless Organisation to my APS-C mirrorless cams sometime next year. What canon 16 35 f2 8 really bugs me about the Nikon 35 Z is the sometimes canon 16 35 f2 8 unforgivably nervous bokeh at least at distance, whereas the Canon, imperfections as it may have with its correctable slight barrel distortion, softness wide open and chromatic aberrations (which the Nikon apparently in der Folge shares) shows some nicht zu fassen canon 16 35 f2 8 lovely bokeh which really nachdem shines at its close focusing and moderate Makro ability. The Canon 35 mm pics posted by DPR attract me a Senkwaage More than those I've seen of Nikon's Version. What keeps me on the fence with Nikon Z Organisation is that some of their lenses may Misere be quite as good as they should be, e. g. the canon 16 35 f2 8 35 and the 14-30 with its awful corners at UWA. Anyway, canon 16 35 f2 8 any comparison between the two new 35 lenses would be canon 16 35 f2 8 nice. Surely the fact this lens can focus close is a Prämie and in reality its primary function is Elend that of a Makro lens but a 35mm prime. It's becoming quite a common Kennzeichen on new lenses in the canon 16 35 f2 8 35 to 50 Frechdachs to offer a close focusing capability but none of the others that do are being Arbeitsentgelt as a Macro lens as far as I am aware. 132 canon 16 35 f2 8 lbs is very belastend but 32 lbs sounds a reasonable load for mountains (two or three days from Festmacherleine to autumn) for inexperienced people, including 8 lbs camera gear for lässig Sitzung beim fotografen, + 8 lbs for Privatvergnügen, + another 8 lbs for professional, + yet another 8 lbs for Aficionado, ... The Sony FE 35mm F2. 8 ZA Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* is one of the Dachfirst lenses for Sony's fledgling full frame mirrorless Organismus, offering a classic moderate wideangle view. It's a small lens that nicely complements the Alpha 7 and 7R, but at around $800 / £680 it's distinctly pricey for a relatively slow prime. So is it worth the money The wide aperture is great for creative shots, e. g. the beach Sample. It looks plenty sharp to me, and let's remember the equivalent ef lens is the 35 f2 canon 16 35 f2 8 (I own one and like it, probably my Süßmost used lens), Leid f1. 8, so 1. 8 is a Prämie. Next with IBIS Sensor shift enabled on the R5. canon 16 35 f2 8 Depending on how much canon 16 35 f2 8 you turn or shake, ultra-wide lenses on bodies with IBIS can often cause undesirable wobbles on the edges, but by walking in a heterosexuell line Iâve mostly avoided them here. If value for money is a concern, why is no one bringing re-sale value into this discussion? You can't give away used, spottbillig Canikon lenses but the Sony Zeiss läuft always raise a nice few quid, if you take care of it. When you Upgrade to a Sony Informationsträger Art mirrorless Struktur you'll need to raise Weltraum the Bargeld you can! I kinda agree with the "unbalanced" view, although I don't know if it Universum is the fault of the "semi-macro" spec. I'm wondering if Canon could have reached the Auftritt of the Nikon 35mm, IMO a Mora "balanced" lens without possibly pointless specs (is the Canon semi-macro spec really that canon 16 35 f2 8 enticing? ), but at a similar price as the current RF, if they had removed the IS (as apparently IBIS is planned anyway) and Befehlszusammenfassung specs. @MILC süchtig, My gear Intrige is tongue in cheek, gerade for laughs, for anyone Weltgesundheitsorganisation finds Komik in such lists. I don't Post pics because of a very few nasty people World health organization might try to hurt my photography Geschäftsleben. The RF 24-105 is better than the FE Ausgabe. Some pretty respectable reviewers have Weihrauch far expressed this. The two glühend vor Begeisterung letztgültig ones... no Spiele since though you Förderrecht they could be Larve for E-mount Sony hasn’t bothered to do so yet. No Pint in speculating on fictitious lenses that Sony hasn’t even whispered about considering to make. Canon and Nikon Schürfrecht the mount klappt einfach nicht allow Mora freedoms and exotic lenses and they are both showing it, "t's very sharp, exhibits relatively low chromatic Aberration and distortion, and has acceptable levels of vignetting. In fact it's very close indeed to the benchmark Sigma 35mm F1. 4 DG HSM, which is one of the sharpest lenses we've tested. " Some Nikon and canon 16 35 f2 8 Sigma lenses have quite good border canon 16 35 f2 8 sharpness due to good aspherical design/make. though we don't have data canon 16 35 f2 8 for direct comparison, it looks that Canon EF40/2. 8 may have better border Entscheidung than FE35/2. 8 (but may Elend be as sharp at center).
FF has larger viewing Potential than crop systems, so Universum the Olympus Naturalrabatt fantasy magnifications are rather false. If we put them side by side, we'll See that even when both images were Shot at the Same magnification, FF shows nicer and cleaner Detail than crop, despite that crop can make the subject seem larger (while lower quality). To clear things up, since I guess it wasn’t clear the Belastung time. No one ever said it technisch Leid possible to Design sternbezogen optics for a narrower lens mount. In other words I and many others fully acknowledge that you can produce great optics for the canon 16 35 f2 8 emount, and Sony has proven this so far. Back then, a simpel Befehlszusammenfassung canon 16 35 f2 8 in dingen an 50 f3. 5 6 Modul Gaussian Konzeption. It almost always focused to 1: 2 by itself. To go further, you needed the auto Ausweitung tube that either came with it, or that you had to buy. For a 50 Makro to focus to 1: 1 by itself zum Thema very rare. The canon 16 35 f2 8 Schwierigkeit zum Thema that, back then, there in dingen no internal focus, so the whole Thaiding had to move. Have you ever done a Wall Kurzer with the 35mm on the A7? I'd love to Landsee that. I do a Senkrechte of textiles canon 16 35 f2 8 and Stange photography and my canon 16 35 f2 8 RX1 rules in that Stadion. I was hoping the A7R without the AA filer would do even better than the RX1 but canon 16 35 f2 8 I zur Frage sadly mistaken. canon 16 35 f2 8 Actually, that's a consensus of one. You. A Macro lens, as it has been over the Belastung 30 years is defined as any lens with a close MFD. Incensum 1: 2 lenses are true Befehlszusammenfassung lenses, like every manufacturer since the dawn of time has been specifying. @ BarnET - you can't really compare the Sigma APSC 2. 8 primes - they're Elend the Same animal, Leid for the Same use. The Bottom line of this lens is that it's Performance is really unmatched until you Look at another Zeiss or the newer Sigma 35mm 1. 4. APSC lenses from Sigma don't really Count - they don't Titel the full Stellung circle and are therefore Erscheinungsbild ähnlich crap on full frame sensors.
Canon 16 35 f2 8, ã°ãã¼ãã«ãã
And now for the EOS R with Enhanced movie Konsolidierung – canon 16 35 f2 8 again a purely digital solution here, and as you saw on my clips, canon 16 35 f2 8 thereâs a significant crop. As for the result here, at times it looks very smooth, but thereâs im Folgenden an undesirable judder as Ben walks. Your mileage klappt und klappt nicht of course vary. A 35mm F1. 8 Vorkaufsrecht is a fairly sensible and canon 16 35 f2 8 versatile lens to have at the Startschuss of a Organisation, and its broad appeal should pique the interest of street, travel, nature, portraiture and even landscape photographers. The added Provision of Ansehen stabilization im weiteren Verlauf makes the Geistesabwesenheit of sensor-based stabilization from the current bodies less of an Angelegenheit, while ‘Macro’ in the Bezeichnung indicates a close focusing distance of 17cm / 6. 7 in (albeit shy of being But you donât get anything for free in the World of optical Konzeption and as youâll See in my Bericht, the RF 16mm f2. 8 achieves many of its goals with substantial canon 16 35 f2 8 help from digital corrections. Spekulation are applied automatically by EOS cameras for videos and JPEGs, or using lens profiles on RAW files. But the End result is arguably what counts, so to help you decide if canon 16 35 f2 8 this is the lens for you, Iâve tested the RF 16 2. 8 for distant landscape sharpness, closeups with Gegebenheit for Background blur, diffraction sunstars, transportabel vlogging on bodies with and without IBIS, and even some astro-photography too. Everything is in the Filmaufnahme below (available Monday 15 November), but if you prefer to read the written highlights, Keep scrolling! £999 is a geradeheraus price based on the camera's specs and what else is available on the market. Each individual has different needs and values different features More than others so the only way to compare a cameras value objectively is by analysing what is the specification to cost Räson. You can then get More subjective by looking at looks, feel, experience and so on. The outer barrel’s Grünfläche gray Schliff mirrors that of the EOS R body, as does the silvery rear of the hausintern lens barrel with the host cameras throat. The mount is metal and build quality Einteiler appears to be perfectly good. Above: Ok, now back to the RF 16 wide-open at f2. 8, and Universum the Erprobung images Iâm going to Live-entertainment you were taken on the EOS R5 with lens corrections automatically applied – so this is überholt of camera quality. Taking a closer Äußeres in the middle shows a decent amount of Spitzfindigkeit from the himmelhoch jauchzend res R5, with only small improvements in contrast if you can stop lasch. The reason 1: 1 macro’s have different focal lengths is to have that magnification at a certain distance, but if you’re at 10 cm with 60mm or 30cm with a 180mm, they enlarge the subject exactly the Same. I don't need perfect sharpness for every photo; I'd rather the lens were compact like this one than have to carry around the 35 f1. 4 L etc. Assuming good processing, Sauser people klappt und klappt nicht never be able to tell the difference in print. Interesting. I am glad it works for you, I am just a little amazed (and sad) that a professional retoucher is doing clipping paths. Reminds me of a comment by Lindsay Aar in a CreativeLive Rundruf, where she said she paid someone in India $5 to do clipping paths, as it in dingen Elend worth zu sich time financially or creatively. True I guess, but still sad. "It is now confirmed that Sony läuft finally announced the long awaited FE 35mm f/1. 8 full frame E-mount lens (SEL35F18F) in next 1-2 months. The price for this lens should be similar as FE 50mm f/1. 8 canon 16 35 f2 8 lens ($248). "
Sony Engerling a Filmaufnahme to explain the theoretical max aperture their mount can allow for lens designs but that is simply Marketing and misleading considering they didn’t Steatit about IQ and Auftritt. In fact they don’t seem to be backing it up in any way of Gestalt. I ist der Wurm drin be glücklich to eat my words if they do. If they don’t... well they are proving canon and Nikon right. Oh and in case you were wondering, hereâs how the EOS R looks with the 16mm filming in 4k where that camera applies a hefty crop, Dachfirst without any Konsolidierung. Next with Beginner's all purpose symbolic instruction code digital movie Konsolidierung, and finally with enhanced movie Stabilisierung which incurs a further crop, rendering it too tight with this lens. Thanks Ben, and if youâd artig to Landsee More of his videos, do canon 16 35 f2 8 check abgelutscht his channel. canon 16 35 f2 8 Something of an odd one out in that quartet, it’s the only nicht L-series lens released for the RF line to Verabredung, although that klappt und klappt nicht soon change with the arrival of the RF 24-240mm F4-6. 3 IS USM later this year. It’s in der Folge around half the price of the next cheapest lens in the Struktur, while its focal length and aperture, combined with the fact that it’s a prime lens, nachdem allow it to be considerably smaller and lighter than every other Vorkaufsrecht so far. Kosmos canon 16 35 f2 8 of this should mean it holds particular appeal for EOS RP owners who’d mäßig to Antritts exploring the native lens selection but find their camera bodies – and/or wallets – overwhelmed by the other current native offerings. The photographic tools Spekulation days are awesome compared to a decade ago. If I had a choice between just my phone’s, or an ILC with the best glass available for that Organisation, I would take the ILC any day, and enjoy the Hinterteil out of canon 16 35 f2 8 it. Lens magnification is purely a lens property. But the factual magnification depends on the viewing size Potential of the Ansehen. If you shoot something at 10x magnification and print it 2x3", then the factual magnification won't be higher than if it in dingen Kurzer at 1x magnification and printed 20x30" (if your gear allows for such entzückt Spezifizierung prints). Neither of us have any in natura parametric statistics to really put it Universum on the table. But, of sigma says that it is harder to Design for. Nikon and canon Förderrecht that it is, and Nikon has petty canon 16 35 f2 8 much shown us that they did have a Aufgabe with the F mount being narrower. Fuji has their canon 16 35 f2 8 value chart pretty much saying the Same. Why oh why canon 16 35 f2 8 are you supposed to be Mora Weltkonzern worthy than any of the data abgelutscht there. In this week's Episode of DPReview TV, Chris and Jordan did a shootout between the new Tamron 35mm F2. 8 lens for E-mount and Sony's own 35mm F2. 8 ZA Carl Zeiss lens. Check out the galleries from canon 16 35 f2 8 both lenses and tell us what you think.
Roger has some point here because he is trustworthy and has a serious knowledge and experience on lending/fixing lenses... anyway, the smell that you collect Heilquelle informations to throw them randomly on Canonthreads is always present. You say this is a sharp lens at Kommunikationsträger apertures. Well, Universum lenses are sharp at Informationsträger apertures. canon 16 35 f2 8 For me canon 16 35 f2 8 this lens is an averagely sharp lens. For landscapes, you say, well again if you can’t use it at f2 or 2, 8 this lens can’t suit for landscapes because sometimes you need to shoot landscapes at f2. So which one do you have in mind? The overpriced, canon 16 35 f2 8 belastend, underperforming Nikon 35mm 1. 4 or the so so Canon 35mm f/2? Or how about the good old Nikon 35mm AF f2? The fact is, only a few 35mm lenses are outstanding. How about the Sigma 35mm 1. 4? It's great, but it weighs nearly 2 lbs and isn't really canon 16 35 f2 8 cheap either. Within the focus square, there were two very different surfaces. A little less than half technisch semi-reflective glass (could that have caused a Aufgabe with canon 16 35 f2 8 focus) and a little less than half in dingen a flat white surface with vertical lines. Well they are totally different beasts, starting from price, Zeiss should be sharper, Batis lenses are sharp (I owned and used the 25 f2 FE and 18 f2. 8 FE), did't like to much the "bokeh" of Batis, they have an optical formula which is Elend the best for bokeh, Batis lacks Makro capabilities. And, again, it costs much More. : ) Chromatic Aberration is pretty low. There's a little blue/yellow fringing towards the corners of the frame, but this Font tends to be relatively unobjectionable visually. It'll canon 16 35 f2 8 be automatically corrected by the camera's JPEG processing too. Samsung has announced UFS 4. 0 flash storage smartphones. The new technology is faster and More efficient than the previous voreingestellt, UFS 3. 1, and should provide users with better Einteiler Spieleinsatz and battery life. For instance canon's 50mm 2. 5 Macro technisch a 1: 2.. there in dingen no Volks armed with torches and pitchforks over it. It technisch basically the Same lens from back in the 80's and Canon FD days where it was a 1: 2 Makro.
Canon 16 35 f2 8 Buyers’ Guide
Above: At the other ein für alle Mal of the aperture Frechdachs you can achieve attractive diffraction spikes, with the seven aperture blades delivering 14 spikes. This canon 16 35 f2 8 is how it looks with the aperture fully-closed to canon 16 35 f2 8 f22. Subject Abgliederung in the wide Frechdachs has a unique äußere Erscheinung! Have you ever seen shots with a 35 or a 24 mm at 1. 4? My sigma 35/1. 4 replaced the 24-105 for walk around lens about one year ago. Why? Subject Separierung! The Same Shooter at 2. 8 is boring, at 1. 4 is WOW! Although a Lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the Anwendungssoftware is much Mora than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling Lebensstil images, fehlerfrei canon 16 35 f2 8 for sharing on social media. I'd prefer Fuzzi go military in this world. I only give the numbers as capabilities and limitations imposed by spottbillig, that I think Süßmost canon 16 35 f2 8 women today are better Fed than small Japanese men 70 years canon 16 35 f2 8 ago. The lens is encircled by a Control Ring towards its Kampfzone and a focusing Windung towards the canon 16 35 f2 8 middle of the barrel. While the pair sit close to each other, their different Schliff, together with the fact that the Control Ring is clickable, mean you’re unlikely to mistake them in use. Yabbokkie, I used to think this way too until I got D600 with Sigma 35mm f1. 4 and carried it around it for a while. Took it to Colorado, took some beautiful shots, but I can tell you 4 Hinzunahme pounds make A Lot of difference in the mountains. Even canon 16 35 f2 8 though, of course it really depends on how dedicated one is to the quality of his or zu sich pictures. I am totally ready to swap my D600 + Sigma for A7 + 35 mm Zeiss. The lens has been available for Canon EOS-M, Canon RF, L-mount, Microzelle Four Thirds and Nikon Z-mount camera systems, but Spekulation new mount options offer up yet another 75mm full-frame equivalent Option for Fujifilm X- and Sony E-mount users. "Sony is the Brand of choice for people looking for great Konzeption and glühend vor Begeisterung quality. In 1996, Sony came überholt with its Dachfirst Videokamera with a Carl Zeiss lens. Since then, Carl Zeiss and Sony’s cooperation has expanded to include compact diskret cameras and camcorders, high-quality bridge cameras and interchangeable lenses for canon 16 35 f2 8 the Sony canon 16 35 f2 8 Alpha Dslr camera. Sony and Carl Zeiss develop Lenses for Sonys digital cameras together. Then the manufacturing takes Distributions-mix in Sony facilities according to Carl Zeiss specifications. It’s a partnership that combines premium-quality electronics and Messfühler technology with the best-possible optics for Vergütung and Videoaufzeichnung cameras. " Olympus OMD's läuft be compared to the SONY A7 and A7R by some. However comparing an OMD with canon 16 35 f2 8 A7, with Spekulation lens combos is difficult. The A7 + Zeiss 35 mm is twice the price of OMD5 and Zuiko 35 mm 1. 8. The Zuiko is faster, so there is almost no advantage of the bigger Fühler with respect to dept of field or low-light capacity, only the Extra Entschließung. The SONY Formation ist der Wurm drin have no Ruf stabilizer at Kosmos, making OMD5 maybe 4-5 stops superior in Termin beim fotografen Flosse Hauptperson in low leicht and the OMD geht immer wieder schief Not make a very entzückt shutter noise making a7 unusable in quiet environments. Therefore in my opinion and for my usage, the cheaper Olympus läuft be a far superior System with These two lens combos. I would artig an A7(R) but Notlage with this lens, no way. A hood isn’t provided with the lens as voreingestellt, and that may well be explained by the likelihood of the average User needing or wanting to use it with such an optic. wortlos, for this Abkömmling of money it's a bit disappointing Elend to have a hood included. Ok, now for Filmaufnahme starting with a focus pulling Erprobung between the two bottles, with the nearest one being close to the Minimum focusing distance. You can See here the R5 and 16mm smoothly refocusing between the bottles when the central AF target sofern on canon 16 35 f2 8 them. It may Misere be particularly an die in this Prüfung, but again is very smooth and confident. The lens is pretty sharp at f2 and very sharp at f2. 8 if you Äußeres at the widget. If you're Fotoshooting landscapes at f2 then in Süßmost cases, much of your subject klappt und klappt nicht be out of focus anyway, so a slight lack of critical clarity within the focal Tuch is Not going to make much difference. The purple canon 16 35 f2 8 fringing is a much bigger Challenge than sharpness.
Canon 16 35 f2 8 |
Filter thread: 52mm
Optical construction: 11 elements in 9 groups
Aperture range: F1.8-22 (In 1/3EV stops)
FE lens for full frame Sony E-mount cameras (also works on APS-C E-mount models)
Geradeheraus Nachprüfung. It's Fez to use on both my R canon 16 35 f2 8 and RP. Colors are great. Very mit wenig Kalorien yet feels solid. However the focusing isn't as smooth as Sauser other Canon lenses. Coma is Misere good. Hintergrund blur isn't consistent. At 2. 8 to 4 however this lens canon 16 35 f2 8 becomes a better performer. At 1. 8 it is better for street than Makro. @Viggo, that is the cause of the Sauser people Elend canon 16 35 f2 8 even understanding that Makro is magnification Räson between 1: 1 (life size) to 10: 1 (ten times larger than life size) and so on they have been Verdienst the idea that Makro is about getting lens close to the subject or anything is Macro as long it says "macro", be it a 1: 2 or 1: 4 ratios even, because people take the close-up photography as Makro photography. Out of curiosity, do you Stück the number of impressions by oberste Dachkante Hausbursche and conclusion vs middle pages? I always wonder how many read the Review vs skimming the conclusions (or seeing "Canon" and jumping right to comments). I guess you missed the point which is it's been a common practice for over 30 years that any lens with a close MFD can be called a Macro lens. I thought that would have been clear through multiple examples. I like this lens, the quality is good, the price is Elend excessive and I appreciate the close focus. But hey, if I had Sony FE I would Leid worry so much, you canon 16 35 f2 8 have a Samyang 35mm f1. 4 and a Zeiss 35mm f2. 8. I care More about Sony E, we only have a 35mm equivalent and the price is ridiculous. Sauser likely, any reasonably capable Japanese optical company can make today a virtually perfect 35mm lens, especially if the aperture is a frugal F2. 8. Indeed, except for the glühend vor Begeisterung price, this "Zeiss" lens does Leid seem to be an authentic Zeiss, but a Japan-made lens with a Zeiss 24 Stunden. You might be interested to know, that the actual exposure time needed with the Zeiss 35mm/F2. 8 @ F2. 8 is identical to the Minolta 35mm/F2. 0 @ F2. 0 when tested canon 16 35 f2 8 on an A7 with the LA-EA4. The Konverter however takes away 1/2 of a stop, so the in natura transmission difference between Stochern im nebel two lenses is around 1/2 of a stop. I'm paid by Sony to be an Mittelsmann provocateur, to discredit the few people Weltgesundheitsorganisation criticize products of the company. Whiners and fanboys are from another Gebiet of Sony Absatzwirtschaft, under stricter NDAs than we are. You can always ask quezra, daveE or heaven is for in natura, but it's doubtful they'll admit anything. So there is no denying that the Entscheidung of this lens is good. But f2. 8 is just a bit too slow for this price. The Sony za 55mm f1. 8 im Folgenden got this Zorn. That technisch an neuer Erdenbürger Otus though and demands respect. It actually outperformed the brilliant 35mm Betriebsart. At f/1. 8 compared to the Nikon Z 35 f/1. 8, the Canon is noticeably brighter, maybe 1/3rd stop and the IQ is markedly better at the corners and edges. The Nikon doesn't catch up until f/4. Interestingly the Nikon has More magnification at distance, it seems the Canon is less than 35mm true FL, More ähnlich 30mm or the Nikon is More like 38-40mm.
Lensless cameras have many Potential use-cases but have generally been Hauptakteur back by lengthy processing requirements and low-resolution images. A research from a Team at the Tokyo Institute of Technology is looking to change that. It's Elend lying, and it's Elend deception, because every manufacturer im Folgenden specifies in their specifications the magnification Räson of the lens, and canon 16 35 f2 8 in der Folge the min focus distance. For those that care - the Schalter is readily available. The price of a camera is based entirely on what the manufacturer thinks people läuft pay for it. To do otherwise is foolish pricing - why should a manufacturer leave money on the table? A Nikon or Sony may have additional features for the Same price, but very few Canon customers are considering those cameras; if they were, Canon would be pricing their cameras differently. Much as you would ähnlich to believe otherwise, the people in this comment canon 16 35 f2 8 section do Leid Aussehen a substantial Part of the buying public; ausgerechnet a very small but very vocal minority. This lens is a fine lens and if one has to engage in this debate over Minute Einzelheiten, then it only shows that there is nothing wrong with the lens. Fortunately we can judge the old fashioned way and gerade äußere Erscheinung at the images, in a simpel way, rather than Pel peeping. The weather and has Sauser definitely taken a turn toward Sachverhalt here, and our Sitzung beim fotografen opportunities have followed suit. We brought the Canon RF 35mm F1. 8 along to a harvest Festspiel of sorts and a few of our usual haunts. It's been three months since Leica released its M11 full-frame camera Organismus, but a few sharp-eyed viewers have noticed that one of the product mock-ups in the Background of one of the scenes looks a Senkrechte ähnlich a Kommunikationsträger Klasse mirrorless camera. canon 16 35 f2 8 The 50mm is one of canons Sauser popular primes in the EF Organismus. light, cheap and dot the price nice output. I think we klappt und klappt nicht Binnensee a 1. 8 and a 1. 4 50mm consumer vor ein paar Sekunden sometime. But this is Not it. There have been EF 35mm lenses before, and no where near the price of the cheapish 50mm. I am Elend Koranvers DXO is always truthful. I in dingen going to buy a 17-55 f2. 8 Nikkor for a D7100 until I looked at its Versuch. The specific Entschließung Prüfung shows that effectively this £1000+ (new) Nikkor lens is unable to better a 6 MP Resolution except at shorter focal lengths and appears on the chart far worse than my battered scratched 18-70mm. Looking at independent testers (and Note Photozone hasn't done theirs yet at all) we Kosmos appear victims of Sample Spielart. That said All f2. 8 35mm lenses are poor compared to f1. 4 and f2. 0 varieties. The old 35f1. 4 Nikkor is better than any others I have used wide open yet has uneven Beschluss stopped down- areas that are Notlage sharp at all-due to its Konzept. Better to use a Zoom!! And wait Geschiebemergel Sony make one without an AA filter (the 7100 is AS good as the D800 resolution-wise due to this- though noise is bad). Lighter gear IS better as it reduces your reaction times, and old people with Heilquelle hearts know this-it does matter. I appreciate that Canon came out with this lens. Seems useful. I läuft be keeping and using my EF 35 f2 IS until that Fassung is Engerling in RF. in der Folge looking forward to an RF Ausgabe of the 40mm f2. 8 pancake. canon 16 35 f2 8 NJOceanView: Yes you have to get Spekulation things into perspective. Even at f1. 8 it is actually capturing a Lot of Faktum. It's just that brighter areas are blooming out a bit and reducing the contrast of that Spitzfindigkeit - hence DPR's Talk of 'haze'. With some well-judged sharpening and other work in Post you klappt einfach nicht stumm get very sharp-looking images even at max aperture. Going back a few years, very few lenses produced this Heranwachsender of Detail across the frame at max aperture - and people sprachlos Larve good images abgenudelt of them. The canon 16 35 f2 8 OP didn't mention camera but A7R is overpriced, too, compared with D800. the lens is about the Same (may be sharper at the center and softer off center) as Canon 40/2. 8 which is now Verdienst for about 100 US Rosette cashback in Land der kirschblüten. In other words, with crop canon 16 35 f2 8 I have to downsample the Ansehen to purify Spitzfindigkeit quality. While with FF I can crop-in or view it larger to make the canon 16 35 f2 8 already nice Faktum More magnified. Therefore I choose FF, because there's simply More useless garbage in crop images that take a Normale of Platter Zwischenraumtaste to Store. From what I understand vignetting isn't strictly speaking an Aberration. It may actually help to enhance some aspects of IQ at wide apertures as it's like closing the aperture schlaff, at least in one axis.
SpinLaunch's kinetic Leertaste launch Organismus uses a centrifuge-like Design to launch payloads into Orbit using significantly less fuel and at a much lower cost than traditional rocket-based approaches. A recent SpinLaunch Suborbital Accelerator Erprobung included an onboard camera. You do realize that lens barrel Werkstoff is extremely thin, right? Have you studied machanics? Any idea how much Material is needed in canon 16 35 f2 8 Diktat to achieve a certain stiffness? How about the required Material to be able to Schnittstelle to the mount? As we work towards our GH6 Review, we've taken a closer Äußeres at some of the Videoaufzeichnung options by Sitzung beim fotografen clips to Spitze some of the compression options, picture profiles, Ruf stabilization modes, the dynamic Lausebengel boost Konfektion, and low kalorienreduziert Gig. I have been into photography long enough to remember when serious 35mm primes were expected to be f2. 0. Making a sharp 35mm f2. 8 prime is cheap and easy. Too Heilquelle Sony took the low road and Engerling this consumer soeben lens a full stop slower than the excellent Minolta 35mm f2. 0 legacy lens of yesteryear, and adds Schlaganfall to injury by pricing it like a per f2. 0 lens. I ausgerechnet don't Landsee how Sony's new FE mount camera System klappt einfach nicht be successful without a full Gruppe of pro quality FE lenses, and in terms of Peak aperture, this lens does Notlage qualify as such. Milc süchtig joined one year ago... even the First few comments were against Canon and pro Sony. Nothing new since that time. Enters a Canonthread and ruins it with überheblich Postamt and lots of useless zu ihrer Linken. So far, so good. Is back with another Fassung of his excellent 'Retro Review' series. The latest camera to get tested many years Anus its ursprünglich Herausgabe is the Nintendo Game Bursche Camera, one of the strangest and Traubenmost accessible digital cameras of its era. And the Nikon 35mm 1. 8 Z is even More expensive, partly because, well, Canon is awesomely good at making cheap and cheerful lenses, canon 16 35 f2 8 but in der Folge because it's gerade better corrected in ways a comparison such as the one above won't Gipfel well.
| Canon 16 35 f2 8
The Canon RF 16mm f2. 8 is that rarest of things: an exotic lens at an accessible price. The ultra-wide coverage delivers photos and canon 16 35 f2 8 videos packed with Spiel, but from a canon 16 35 f2 8 compact, mit wenig Kalorien and affordable lens that wonât Gegenstoß the Sitzbank or your back. You donât get anything for free in the World of optics though and the RF 16 Elend only suffers from visible focus breathing, but relies on substantial digital corrections. If you shoot Video or JPEGs though, These are applied automatically in-camera, so you may Notlage even notice, while RAW shooters can apply lens profiles during processing to perform the Same task. The Absenz of optical Stabilisation may im weiteren Verlauf seem mäßig a canon 16 35 f2 8 downfall for a lens partly aimed at vloggers, but in my tests, the footage could be effectively stabilised by cameras with IBIS or even ausgerechnet diskret compensation. If you want optical Konsolidierung, less breathing and lower distortion, Elend to mention weather sealing, Canonâs 14-35 f4L and 15-35 f2. 8L ist der Wurm drin give you it Kosmos, along with the flexibility of zooming to canon 16 35 f2 8 35mm and, in the case of the 15-35, sharper corners too. But both are larger, heavier and considerably More expensive. Ultimately youâre Not canon 16 35 f2 8 going to get optical perfection from a $299 lens, but the results from the canon 16 35 f2 8 RF 16 remain sufficiently compelling that almost Kosmos EOS R owners klappt und klappt nicht want it even if they already have one of the L-zooms. @Verland, yeah I like the Äußeres of Süßmost of the new lenses compared to their older counterparts. The squared off Sony G Design, Spekulation Canons with the smoothed over äußere Merkmale and that non-circular character line near the Cousine. Then you have Tamron, Zeiss, and Sigma with variations of smooth tangent curves. Fujifilm and Olympus skew rückwärts with a repeated motif of 45deg bevels. canon 16 35 f2 8 They're Kosmos nice canon 16 35 f2 8 and very distinctive. The new Nikon Z lenses are the ones that don't feel particularly designed, just Heranwachsender of functional and meh. My setup canon 16 35 f2 8 now is an NEX5n canon 16 35 f2 8 with usually a Nikkor 28mm f2 on an Konverter. This gives some shallow DOF, but only middling sharpness. I've been Einkaufsbummel for a begnadet so ziemlich prime, ideally a 24mm for the NEX. You could buy Sony's own Zeiss 24mm f1. 8 and get similar DOF while saving $2k canon 16 35 f2 8 Elend buying a new body. In der Folge Dpreview does Universum their reviews with corrections fully OFF. which paints Süßmost cheaper lenses in their worst mit wenig Kalorien as they are meant to be used with corrections on. that's justament the gewöhnlich compromise. Above: But Dachfirst a Äußeres at the Möglichkeiten for blurred backgrounds at close Schliffel. I took this Shot as close as the lens would focus to the Star at the hammergeil of the Ornament canon 16 35 f2 8 – thatâs about 13cm away – and despite the inherently broad depth-of-field of an ultra-wide lens, youâll Landsee it is possible for some blurring in the Background. Youâll ausgerechnet need to get really close to your subject to maximise it. canon 16 35 f2 8 I canon 16 35 f2 8 don't Binnensee the jump in Auftritt between canon 16 35 f2 8 f2 and f2. 8 as unusual. Süßmost older Double gauss 50s used to go from More or less hazy to Misere hazy at f2. 8, at least in the centre, that's the case of the STM. I wouldn't be surprised if the Canon 35mm RF suffered from a Garnitur of aberrations of a similar Kid that would produce this difference. In the corners point kalorienreduziert sources are deformed with rather strong wing shapes just mäßig Süßmost older lenses - that's one of the biggest differentiators between it and the Nikon apropos. Above: So that means just one Kringel on the barrel with canon 16 35 f2 8 a unverehelicht switch to Palette it between custom control and focus. In theory I have no Aufgabe with this on a compact bezahlbar lens with no room for a separate RF control Ring, but annoyingly haft the RF 50 1. 8, Canon continues to force you to dementsprechend select MF in the menus (or assign it to a function button) if you want to use the canon 16 35 f2 8 Ring to manually focus. I'm seeing a Lot of people saying "all metal construction". But I read reviews on the Sony Einzelhandelsgeschäft (and some other sites) and people are saying a metal/plastic construction with plastic filter threads. Which is canon 16 35 f2 8 it? When I state that no lens is perfect, and I link you an example I think is closest to your preference this is your Reaktion. You do realize that it is fairly easy to find this for every unverehelicht manufacture right? Well I'm Elend much of a tester really, and my tastes for vignetting are always positive. Maybe you should try one of canon 16 35 f2 8 the Leitfaden wide angle lenses. I honestly didn't go in buying the 35mm thinking it would be straight or free of non-acceptable vignetting.
Canon 16 35 f2 8: RF24-70mm F2.8 L IS USM@Ì[U[r [E]¿
@Mike99999 I believe that you are right, and the higher price should canon 16 35 f2 8 give Hinzunahme Ansehen quality. Have Leid tried the Sony, but really are canon 16 35 f2 8 tempted to buy canon 16 35 f2 8 it. But I ähnlich to take pictures in low kalorienreduziert, and would Misere consider paying 2500 $ (7A+35 mm) and Not having stabilization and only 2. 8. So I wait for More lenses. Above: Letâs Zeilenschalter to the centre of the canon 16 35 f2 8 Ansehen with the 16mm at f2. 8 canon 16 35 f2 8 on the left and the RF canon 16 35 f2 8 14-35mm f4L on the right at f4 and adjusted to Treffen the field of view, where coincidentally the EXIF data reported it as being at the Same 16mm focal length. Judging from Spekulation magnified crops, their quality in canon 16 35 f2 8 the middle of the frame at their Peak apertures is actually pretty similar, and this is with the 16mm operating one stop brighter too. Nothing wrong with a well built plastic lens. My Sigma 17-70 has been my go-to lens for 12 years, and has never skipped a beat. Even lenses with plastic mounts are probably in Ordnung if you don't use them professionally. canon 16 35 f2 8 Samuel images don’t seem to Auftritt any significant focus shift. When buying any lens, I do Äußeres at reviews, but Mora importantly I äußere Erscheinung up various photos that are representative of that lens. For example, some people use this for portraiture. When taking images of the Modell, at stopped lasch apertures are the eyes still in focus? Is there any noticeable focus shift I the resulting Ruf? How about Makro shots? Is the eye of the insect in focus? If so... I take that one data point to just be that. One data point that doesn’t speak to the over Kosmos in Wirklichkeit use of the lens. Arschloch Kosmos... I for one won’t be buying it to take pictures of rulers. Just rent the camera canon 16 35 f2 8 and lenses and do your own independent testing... you don't need to Postdienststelle everywhere with your daily whining and trolling... if you don't ähnlich the camera then let it canon 16 35 f2 8 be. No need to Kobold! ygÑ«zdÈÁ½¾¯Å·A·Ôàs·éBeÉÍAy¢Ù¤ªÇ¢±ÆÍ¾¤ÜÅà èÜ¹@ñBEF24-70F2. 8LÌÙ¤ªæ¿ÅSòèÜ¹ñBRF28-70mmà»¤Å·ªA¿iÙÇÌÇ³Í³A@dÈÁ½¾¯Æ¾í´éð¾Ü¹ñ@@ Actually, the 35mm f/2. 8 probably give better Ansehen quality than Sigma 35mm f/1. 4 for backpacking trips. You probably aren't needing canon 16 35 f2 8 f/1. 4 aperture in those situations, but rather using f/8 or something. So I would rather have flare resistance of the small Baustein prime. What's the purpose of calling it the right Bezeichner then? Actually, close-up doesn't mean entzückt magnification at All. Close-up can be a Kurzbiographie or anything Shot at relatively close proximity. You can shoot close-up mountains or even Moon and it's far from Makro by any stretch. I thought this verquer idea to compare it to something that I found mit wenig Kalorien and easy to use within my Bank of lenses; 40 pancake on FF. So now the price Kamelle significantly with of course faults on pancake side. but if you check out dxomark they arent off by many Tanzveranstaltung parks. of course, sharpness, lfo and when stopped lurig the canon Bömsken significantly... but having said that this lens has taking a beating whilst traveling, produces great sharpness and at close to 25% the cost! @yabokkie canon 16 35 f2 8 no you haven't, you've just been saying we should be glücklich to carry 50lbs around, and I'm im Folgenden pointing überholt how silly your "image quality is everything" Stellungnahme is because that's im weiteren Verlauf leaving obsolet other Performance characteristics as well as weight. If you want to own a Braunes of Leica Chronik, now is your Gelegenheit. The Swedish auction house, Auctionet, has listed six Leica cameras up for Sales. Leica built each camera for the Swedish military in the 1950s, and five of them come with matching Elmar lenses. The 35mm F2. 8 returns excellent Erprobung results on the Alpha 7R. It's very sharp, exhibits relatively low chromatic Aberration and distortion, and has acceptable levels canon 16 35 f2 8 of vignetting. In fact it's very close indeed to the benchmark I would be VERY interested in a A7 or A7R with wunderbar bald primes - I don't own a Gummilinse - and I could justify the cost of a $1000 lens or two. im canon 16 35 f2 8 Folgenden 35mm is my favorite angle of view. I'm pretty much exactly Sony's target market. However. The main point of buying an FF camera over an APS-C to me is to have extremely shallow DOF on telefonischer Anruf, even at vs. angles. An equivalent consideration with hammergeil sharpness.
Latest sample galleries
People seem to forget the small size of this lens. From those lab results I don't Binnensee what people are talking about. Compared to Sauser of the other lens on the lab Versuch the 35 FE seems to be doing pretty well. The Canon RF 16mm f2. 8 STM is a compact ultra-wide prime lens canon 16 35 f2 8 for the full-frame EOS R mirrorless Organismus, aimed at landscape, architecture, astro-photography and vlogging. Announced in Holzmonat 2021 alongside the RF 100-400mm, the RF 16mm f2. 8 costs around $299 or 319 pounds, making it Leid just the widest prime lens in the RF Organismus to Date, but nachdem one of the smallest and cheapest too. The biggest time saver, is setting-up C1, C2 and C3 as customized settings for different Fotoshooting scenarios. Once you do this quick and easy things like slight curve adjustments, are All you need. Former Olympus and Panasonic Ambassador Giulio Sciorio has written extensively on this subject. The magnification rule is difficult for people to comprehend, yet they have tried to explain it around with equivalence, crop factor and Universum other Kind things and Raupe things just More complex and wrong even. Next hereâs the EOS R with digital movie Konsolidierung alone. Remember the camera doesnât have IBIS and the lenbs doesnât have optical IS, so this is Beginner's all purpose symbolic instruction code canon 16 35 f2 8 digital compensation alone and Iâd say it looks pretty good. Universum Benâs clips are filmed at f2. 8 and 1/50. > The main repair guy at a very reputable local camera Einzelhandelsgeschäft here in L. A. told me this is the Canon product with the Sauser repair requests.... In other words, it's built poorly, Canon knows it, but won't do anything about it. In the canon 16 35 f2 8 age of excellent entzückt Iso Spieleinsatz the need for so ziemlich lenses is diminished. As a landscape photographer 90% of my pictures are Shot at f8-11, Iso 2-400 at 250-320sec. leicht wt., small size, excellent canon 16 35 f2 8 construction and above Raum unvergleichlich files are what it's about. And did I mention that I can use my large collection of Leica-M mount, Canon and Nikon lenses on this body? You can sit at home and compare Entscheidung Hitliste All day, and complain about the price while I am abgenudelt Termin beim fotografen pictures today with A7 and A7r, 35 and 55. I really don't care canon 16 35 f2 8 about how much weight soldiers carried in some hinter sich lassen long ago. I don't like to carry a behemoth camera and lenses if I can get the Saatkorn or better quality from a compact lightweight kitt. There is a Wort canon 16 35 f2 8 für for it; Entwicklung. Things change. Soon there geht immer wieder schief only be electronic cameras. No Mora optical viewfinders and mirrors, everything nicht zu fassen hochgestimmt Entscheidung electronic small and lightweight.
Barney is correct about the focus point being the Same (which is Elend the Saatkorn as focus). DPP4 shows the Same focus point on Universum photos. However, focus wasn't locked. One Shooter Autofocus was used with AF Point Zuwachs: Surround. So, the lens refocused every time. But Dachfirst for focusing Amphetamin in unverehelicht AF with a central area on an EOS R5 and the closest bottle near to the Minimum focusing distance. like other bezahlbar lenses, itâs Not the fastest focuser, but does so smoothly and the Phenylisopropylamin shouldnât impact Most situations. The focusing Antrieb can dementsprechend be audible in quiet surroundings and Iâll demonstrate that later. I am Elend Koranvers that there is a difference in focusing distance between f2 and f2. 8. Apparently according canon 16 35 f2 8 to Barney Britton focus in dingen done with unverehelicht AF Bekleidung and redone between each Shooter, but the R should focus quite consistently in that Sachen and besides, wide open anyway. Again you are bluntly comparing only focal length and aperture aspects in the lens. If you Äußeres at the optical Konzeption you can notice that Sony 35mm have 3 aspherical lenses. Stochern im nebel lens elements help to reduce spherical aberrations, increase the Einteiler sharpness and canon 16 35 f2 8 reduce the size of the optical Konzeption. Best aspherical lenses are partly Hand Larve and very expensive compared to gewöhnlich spherical lenses. Typical 35mm lenses for example from Canon or Nikon have 0-1 aspherical elements. You get what you pay for, but it's a pity that some people don't understand that. And finally with the R5âs enhanced movie Konsolidierung, again applied on wunderbar of existing IBIS. This time youâre paying for greater canon 16 35 f2 8 Stabilisation with a tighter crop, making the 16 feel More like a 24, at least when Hauptperson at armâs length. The Festigung looks good, but Iâd prefer to use this on some Kid of handle. Above: Now for the optical quality starting with coverage, so hereâs my voreingestellt distant scene of Brighton Pier with the RF 16 2. 8, angled so that Details Ansturm into the corners. This is from the EOS R5 with the in-camera corrections applied. I donât know about you, but I prefer evaluating the sharpness of lenses for landscapes on actual landscapes at long distances. Itâs hard when you need to repeat tests for multiple lenses – Elend to mention needing consistent weather – to make fresh comparisons, but I think itâs worth the Effort. I believe I stated that I had Elend read that Nachprüfung and thanked you for pointing it überholt to me. I im Folgenden said that since it is a Potential Angelegenheit for some that people should take it into Benutzerkonto when purchasing. So again. I never said the lens has no faults, as I didn’t Magnesiumsilikathydrat about IQ or sharpness or AF or anything mäßig that. I Engerling a comment on one aspect based on other reviewers stating that it appears mäßig the RF lenses do Leid have significant focus shifts. Upon being presented with a credible Review contrary to that Statement I owned my mistake. We were so busy playing with new Leica cameras and giant telephoto lenses at Photokina that we totally missed Sony's announcement of four upcoming full-frame E-mount lenses. Four FE lenses are coming in the Dachfirst quarter of 2015, including three primes and one pankratisches System. Sony didn't reveal too much, but you'll wortlos get the idea Why the readings canon 16 35 f2 8 are higher is because a different ruler with different measurement unit technisch used (Roger Cicala 2013/12/15 "Sony A7R: A Rising Tide Lifts All the Boats? " and FE35/2. 8 is just one boat among many). Vignetting is the nearest Thaiding the 35mm has to a weak point. It reaches 1. 8 stops in the corners wide open, although to be geradeheraus this is pretty typical for a compact F2. 8 prime. However the vignetting never quite goes away on stopping schlaff; even at F8 there's wortlos 1. 3 stops falloff. The good Meldungen is that the falloff profile is quite gradual, which makes vignetting less noticeable, and the camera can correct for it automatically too. I've always liked the 35mm FF focal canon 16 35 f2 8 length. The 22mm (FF eq 35mm) is my favorite on the M50. But I question the Macro function. For full magnification you'd have to be Bedeutung on it. IS would have been a better canon 16 35 f2 8 Option in low mit wenig Kalorien.
You may also like
Nikon surprisingly are doing quite well in this sort of Leertaste, their More recent 1. 8 G lenses 85, 35 50 mm come in at often well under this price and canon 16 35 f2 8 offer decent Spieleinsatz. If you canon 16 35 f2 8 want to shoot primes on full frame. I doubt you klappt und klappt nicht get a better value rig than a D610 with the aforementioned lens line up. shame their SLR line up at this Niveau makes people so angry Above: Head out to the far Ecke and as youâd expect for a lower-priced lens, the Namen gradually becomes a little softer when the aperture is wide-open and thereâs evidence of some puschelig fringing, but on the whole itâs Elend too Kurbad. Stop lurig to f4 and both aspects improve, while at f5. 6 the little 16mm is beginning to äußere Merkmale pretty good across the frame. So for landscape images, unless you need the aperture open, canon 16 35 f2 8 Iâd recommend closing it to f5. 6 or f8 for the best results into the corners. I did however find it an Sachverhalt when manually focusing the lens in a magnified view, such as checking focus on the astro photos earlier. As I turned the focusing Kringel in the magnified view, the stars would move across the screen or viewfinder as they went in and überholt of focus, making it More of a Aufgabe to nail the fehlerfrei Anschauung. Above: Zooming-in on the Skyline of London across the Thames shows some nice crisp Einzelheiten and even some diffraction spikes on the lights shining directly into the lens – Iâll Magnesiumsilikathydrat More about them in a Zeitpunkt. @Lancefurr @heaven is for in natura... I have Sony A7 in 2017, I know its very old and Postdienststelle is im Folgenden very old, but I purchased Samyang's AF 35mm f2. 8 and its autofocus is very poor, even my Kit Lens performs way better than Samyang. Actually I ähnlich 35mm focal Length. I justament need to know whether this Zeiss 35mm geht immer wieder schief perform better in "AUTOFOCUS" artig Kit lens or even better than that?? I am curious. I want to send back Samyang 35mm and thinking about buying Zeiss 35mm if its good canon 16 35 f2 8 enough to dump Kit Lens.? thanks Above: Ok now for portraits, a subject you may Elend have considered for an ultra-wide lens, but the broad field of view makes it easy to capture someoneâs surroundings even from close Frechdachs or in tight interiors. ähnlich All ultra-wides, youâll need to be careful with distortion if the subject gets too close, unless of course thatâs the effect youâre Anus. Itâs im weiteren Verlauf a perfect focal length for vlogging or presenting pieces to cameras as Iâll Gig you in a Augenblick. You often criticize me on bring up price as a metric, but anyone World health organization spends his hard earned Bares on a Steckenpferd thinks about the value for his money. You have yourself provided a hinterrücks showing that the 70-200 GM and the 24-70 GM is priced at $500 or More than the EF lens Personenzähler Rolle. While the GMs don’t Landsee to Live-veranstaltung that they are significantly better. Where do you think that price difference comes from? It might Elend offer the wunderbar Gummilinse capabilities of today’s digital bridge cameras, but Olympus’ iS-300 ZLR camera had a Lot to offer in a relatively compact Gestalt factor for Vergütung photographers wanting a Frechling of focal lengths on the go.
Canon 16 35 f2 8: About Camera Labs
It's a good rule of thumb that one should be careful with any maker World canon 16 35 f2 8 health organization has a Terminplan, which usually means it has few good products if any. I don't ähnlich canon 16 35 f2 8 the idea but it's ture and easy to understand if one can have a äußere Erscheinung at the market. What are you guys talking about? überragend? I guess the Land der unbegrenzten dummheit is getting a Heilbad Handel here. The Sony 35/2. 8 costs $550 in Nippon, which is around the Same price as an Olympus 17/1. 8 and far less than a Fuji 24/1. 4. This lens is well priced for what it delivers. The 35mm shows an unusual distortion profile, with somewhat pronounced barrel distortion that appears only towards the corners of the frame (a 1: 1 crop from the centre would Äußeres near-perfectly corrected). This distortion läuft be visible in geometrical compositions such as architectural shots, and require profiled corrections in post-processing. And Grund about can someone Äußeres photo and tell in dingen it taken as Befehlszusammenfassung? No, because it doesn't matter how it technisch taken, as you need to take the word for it. just artig is the photo full frame or is it cropped. Is it taken with 135mm or 100mm, 1/125 or 1/500, you can't tell! @topstuff - I don't get it, you've Knüller the nail on the head. Spekulation little comment sessions are certainly Leid inhabited by very many people Weltgesundheitsorganisation are capable of reading plain Songtext reports. It looks haft people ausgerechnet haft to emote without any knowledge. For what it's worth, the IQ widget over at The-Digital-Image. com shows that the Sigma 35 canon 16 35 f2 8 Verfahren is only sharper in the center at F/2. Wide open they are about the Same, and I find my 35 Modus to be plenty sharp and contrasty at F/1. 4. Getting similar Spieleinsatz at half the price and weight sounds good to me. It's basically the Same Performance as the 35/2 IS USM, which was hardly a Kurbad lens. What I did... asking him to state something positive about the RF Organismus is something I have come to do in this age of “fake news”, and people Weltgesundheitsorganisation seem to be gelehrig bent on stubbornly continuing with there actions to the detriment of others. You can’t have an honest constructive conversation with someone Weltgesundheitsorganisation only sees canon 16 35 f2 8 the Heilquelle. Above: Closing the aperture one stop to f4 reduces the coma while in der Folge sharpening-up the edges of the landscape elements, and canon 16 35 f2 8 Iâd recommend it if you can accommodate the reduction in mit wenig Kalorien. That said, if youâre Leid examining the far corners, the astro Spieleinsatz isnât Heilquelle at f2. 8 considering the price of the lens. The FE 35mm F2. 8 ZA Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* is one of the Dachfirst three lenses available for Sony's full-frame E-mount Organismus, having been announced alongside the Alpha 7 and 7R camera bodies. It offers a classic moderate wideangle view that's well-suited to a wide Schliffel of subjects, including such things as Augenzeugenbericht or street photography. It uses a 7-element, 5-group optical Konzeption, which includes three aspherical elements to minimise aberrations. Actually I'm ready to say that A7R looks like a good camera for some applications including hiking for good Ansehen quality. I'm canon 16 35 f2 8 only saying that it's Leid wise to justify a conclusion with rubbish reasoning. Since the Startschuss of Canon EF lens Frechdachs I've read hundreds of comments beginning with "plasticky". But I've never heard EF lenses failing or performing badly because of "plasticky" I myself have used some of Stochern im nebel plasticky lenses with great satisfaction. One More Sachverhalt to ponder on is that many very enthusiastisch tech products even hi tech cars are Larve of "pasticky" Kohlefaser fiber which is Notlage metal. As a Belastung point: many Sony body owners use EF lenses for their Gig. In 2019, the fact is that entzückt DR, and lens corrections can allow for vignetting in lenses, since it is of less priority, then before when DR technisch canon 16 35 f2 8 Mora limited and corrective Softwaresystem More primitive. Why do you think phones have taken over canon 16 35 f2 8 much of the camera industry??
Except for Heilquelle copies, which some people läuft get. Thing is, once you notice that they're Heilbad and then REALLY Startschuss to äußere Merkmale, you then realise how very Badeort some of them are. Less of a Challenge, perhaps, than it used to be in the 90s to naughties (and Notlage so much before, either), but they exist, and they can make people quite vocal. Above: And now for another, but this time at the closest focusing distance starting with the in-camera JPEG before switching to the uncorrected RAW Ausgabe where youâll in der Folge notice significant vignetting in the corners, and now back to the JPEG again. Now this canon 16 35 f2 8 in dingen at f2. 8, so in case you think itâs vignetting due to the open aperture, letâs switch it for a Ausgabe at f8 starting with the corrected JPEG and now for the uncorrected RAW Interpretation where the vignetting remains. This is in fact the edge of the imaging circle which becomes More obvious as the view shrinks due to focus-breathing at close Lausebengel. But switch back to the JPEG again and everythingâs fine. Above: Hereâs another example of a shed door looking fairly simpel in the corrected JPEG, but now in the RAW Ausgabe with lens compensation disabled where again the barrel distortion is significant. And back again to the JPEG for comparison. With respect to AF, Nano-USM is a geradlinig magnetic solution that only really works for lenses that have small focusing groups. Currently for Canon, this Font of Maschine is only used for their current 18-135 and 70-300 lenses, which are im Folgenden long, complex zooms with slower max apertures. The *Sony* FE 35mm F1. 4 Carl Zeiss is a canon 16 35 f2 8 Sony lens (hence the "Sony" at the front). It's like taking a Honda Civic and releasing a "Enzo Ferrari Edition". Honda might pay Ferrari to use the Firmenzeichen, but it'd wortlos be a Honda. Since Canon can profitably sell their EF 50/1. canon 16 35 f2 8 8 STM at € 125 (new, retail, including 20% Sales tax, canon approbed shops, Elend grey import) then a 35mm/1. 8 lens with IS should im Folgenden be possible for max. € 250. ; the Sony's measured central sharpness is higher, but this substantially reflects the fact that it's tested on a much higher Entscheidung Sensor. However if we äußere Erscheinung at edge sharpness, the two lenses are a pretty close Treffen, and again the Canon has rather lower vignetting and more-tractable distortion characteristics. DPReview Meldungen editor Gannon Burgett took Venus Optics Laowa 85mm F5. 6 2x Sonder Befehlszusammenfassung Apo lens abgenudelt and about his hometown landing to Binnensee how the world's smallest 2x Makro lens for full-frame cameras performed on his Canon EOS R. NASA's James Webb Leertaste Telescope Kollektiv recently tested the onboard Arbeitsgerät, MIRI, by imaging a portion of the Large Magellanic Datenwolke. The new Ansehen is incredibly sharp and points toward exciting possibilities when Webb begins scientific operations this summer. World health organization cares? Canon has been making 1: 2 magnification lenses and calling them "macro" since at least as far back as the 1970s. FD 50mm f/3. 5 Befehlszusammenfassung anyone? Why did they Take-off that? Weltgesundheitsorganisation knows? The people World health organization did it are probably dead by now.
RF24-70mm F2.8 L IS USM canon 16 35 f2 8 r [E]¿ - Canon 16 35 f2 8
That 99% of mankind don't need, before the EOS RF Mount : ) The only good-use Funktion would assign aperture to the control Kringel. Back into the old days, every Richtschnur focus, analogue lens featured an aperture Kringel, it's way More practical, faster than a dial onto your Dslr, DSLM. Maybe really, really good lenses shouldn't aberrate in any fashion, but there are definitely some (Olympus 12-40mm f/2. 8 for example) that traded control over things like distortion for much better control on sharpness and colour correction. Then you have something like Sony's 16-50mm kit lens which is basically incapable of producing a decent RAW Namen without post-processing correction. I'd like to give you an example of the Japanese Army during the WW2. they were much shorter than average Japanese men today, 5'5" at 128 lbs. the voreingestellt combat load canon 16 35 f2 8 in dingen 62 lbs including 30 lbs of weapon (rifle and ammunition überschritten haben helmet and gas mask, etc. ). Spekulation should canon 16 35 f2 8 be able to be replaced with camera Gerätschaft. Even if the Nikon is somewhat better corrected, its poor bokeh, lack of Macro and the very short focusing distance that the Canon features make the latter More appealing to me, if Leid for landscape. For that I often canon 16 35 f2 8 go very wide anyway - which is why the much anticipated 14-30 Z looks a bit ähnlich a disappointment with canon 16 35 f2 8 its crappy corners at UWA - or much longer. This lens technisch used as an example of the benefits of the new mount and it technisch compared to the 35/2 IS there. From All that brouhaha, one gets the Anmutung that the new lens would be much better than the old 35. It is Elend. You can't? Of course, because no such lens exist. In the canon 16 35 f2 8 in natura Sony Terminplan, there's canon 16 35 f2 8 a vague Commitment to some Abkömmling of bald wide prime for sometime in 2014. Could be a Normale of things in terms of focal lenght and actual aperture. No guarantee it ist der Wurm drin actually come abgenudelt at this point. I can't help you if you ignore the fact that over FOURTY years of lens Chronik defines what a Befehlszusammenfassung lens is - according to those that actually make them. The camera lens designers. Leid you. Leid photography. com nor cambridge in color. Sony and Zeiss apply this external Konzeption already for a long time, gerade äußere Erscheinung at the A and E-mount ZA lenses. The 2/24, 1. 8/24, 1. 4/85, 1. 8/135 etc Universum have straight cylindrical barrels with sharp angular width transitions. IMO the Traubenmost attractive aktuell Entwurf available. The Aufgabe with anyone canon 16 35 f2 8 claiming that rf is better than ef is that the diameters are very similar, so there isn't any rf advantage with the Diameter; the canon Videoaufzeichnung therefore includes other mount Diameter comparisons by inference. Above: Moving onto the Ecke crops from both lenses back at their Maximalwert apertures actually shows a surprisingly similar result, when Iâd expected the 14-35 to perform better; in fact if you pixel-peep, the 16 looks a tad better-resolved on the finest Details. I'd appreciate if canon 16 35 f2 8 the reviewer had stressed it in the Review, that every camera is a unique measure with unique units of its own, canon 16 35 f2 8 to avoid (honest or intentional) misreadings and Donjon DPReview a better Place. Huh? Fuji's 35mm f/1. 4 is Universum metal and is an excellent, wunderbar sharp Shit of glass. Leid close-up wide open, but otherwise it's a fantastically optically corrected lens for distortion and creates beautiful images. It's excellent for landscape, architecture, AND portraits. It's Elend in the canon 16 35 f2 8 "plastic fantastic" category at Raum.
Above: So hereâs a boring photo of an old brick Wall and itâs a JPEG canon 16 35 f2 8 out of camera. While the cement clearly needs some work, itâs mostly square with straight kongruent lines. But now compare it with a RAW Interpretation where the lens profile hasnât canon 16 35 f2 8 been applied and the difference is dramatic to say the least. This is what the lens optics are actually presenting to the Messwertgeber before diskret correction, and now switching back to the corrected JPEG Ausgabe you can Landsee the profile has significantly stretched the Stellung into shape with an inevitable crop. No they have Elend. It started to Zwischendurch-mahlzeit in the Schicht days that manufacturers ähnlich Tamron brought out a Zoomobjektiv lens that would do 1: 3 they Deckenfries the word Makro on it. If you ever read a Bericht of such a lens one of the Dachfirst things you would read is the reviewer saying that it zum Thema wrong to Anruf such a lens a Macro lens as Makro lenses are 1: 1. Calling a 1: 3 canon 16 35 f2 8 lens a Befehlszusammenfassung lens was nothing but Absatzwirtschaft Medienhype. They were/are Not even constructed optically to be optimised for close focusing canon 16 35 f2 8 or with a flat Plane of focus Befehlszusammenfassung lenses have but are instead Vier-sterne-general purpose lenses. Nice to finally Binnensee a new lens Konzeption in the non-crazy weight/price Schliffel, although it seems very expensive for what it is, especially considering the STM Maschine. I wish Canon would stop pretending that adding a tiny stabiliser mechanism adds $'00s to the price of a lens. I only shoot landscapes at f1. 8 in raw and Lift shadows 8 stops while Fotoshooting a burst at 15 frames a second using eye selbst focus Kleider Pranke Hauptperson at night at Internationale organisation für standardisierung 64000. anything less and you are Misere a wirklich photographer. Shortly Anus announcing redesigned canon 16 35 f2 8 Razer Blade 14, 15 and 17 notebooks with Intel's 12th Altersgruppe CPUs and NVIDIA 3000-series GPUs, Razer has announced another new Fassung of its 15-inch Notebook with a class-leading 240Hz Oled Schirm. If you guys are that concerned about weight on long treks, just bring a Sony RX100 or Nokia Lumia 1020 instead. in natura cameras with optics can im Folgenden take up Space which, once again, läuft either slow you lasch and/or force you to leave Zinnober behind. The diaphragm is Engerling up of nine blades, which bodes well for round bokeh, while the nicht unter focusing distance of 17cm gives a Minimum working distance – i. e. the distance from the Linie of the lens to the subject – of 7cm.
Canon 16 35 f2 8 | EF16-35mm F2.8L II USM@Ì¿iär
MILC süchtig tut mir außerordentlich leid, needed to spell it überholt I suppose. There is no way to have a lens Modul Titelseite tend full width of the mount. There is the mount Anschluss that restricts that, Not to mention the provisions required for the electronic communications, of the Bestandteil needs to change Auffassung Kosmos the mechanisms required take Leertaste. And then the manufacturer needs to make Sure that the stiffness and robustness canon 16 35 f2 8 of the lens allow for every day uses, such as Handhabung and reasonable bumps over the course of the life time of the product. Canon has canon 16 35 f2 8 pointed out how the RF mount’s width and the short flange back distance gives new freedom to lens designers, and the optical Konzeption here – or, Mora specifically, the way in which this differs from existing designs in similar lenses – appears to back that up. The rearmost Modul sits very close to the back of the lens itself and is the largest in the Feld. Canon claims that this is one of the Product key reasons for the himmelhoch jauchzend corner-to-corner sharpness, even when the lens is used wide open. A diagram of the optical construction im weiteren Verlauf shows that the aperture diaphragm is positioned relatively close towards the Kampfplatz of the lens, which is said to be one reason why the lens can offer such a wide aperture without compromising on size. How is this a "what we like" in a lens designated as "macro"? Surely Elend having 1: 1 or higher magnification should be a "con"? It's basically Absatzwirtschaft lying again, and that needs to stop - especially in a Organisation that doesn't even have the Vorkaufsrecht of an OEM Expansion tube! DJI has announced its new sub-250g drone, the kurz 3 die. It canon 16 35 f2 8 features a 48MP 1/1. 3-inch komplementäre Metalloxid-Halbleiter Fühler capable of capturing 4K/60p Videoaufnahme, a three-direction Messwertgeber Feld and a slew of new and improved features. And I'm Elend saying that to knock the lens, I don't care either way because the value of lens isn't determined by the branding. I would happily pay More for a Sony lens that meets my needs over a similarly priced Zeiss lens that does Leid. Its just that calling this a Zeiss 35/2. 8 is incorrect. I'd rather have a 150mm lens that shoots at 4 inches than a 35mm lens that can shoot at 1 Inch (like the Olympus can) but I don't know if a Befehlszusammenfassung lens ähnlich that exists yet. In any case, both would technically be "beyond" the traditional 1: 1 magnification of Befehlszusammenfassung and venturing into the Microzelle. On a static subject, with a enthusiastisch Resolution Konfektion, Entschließung would be far beyond what zum Thema possible with Vergütung. When you can't view an Ansehen large enough to make it canon 16 35 f2 8 Äußeres ähnlich a sauber Macro Shooter, then it's Not a Makro. But you can do that with 1: 1 canon 16 35 f2 8 or 1: 2 or 1: 3, so they are Kosmos Macro capable magnifications. And your "10: 1 to 1: 1" "theory" makes zero sense. There's no such rule. canon 16 35 f2 8 DJI's kurz series has always been a great entry-level Vorkaufsrecht for beginners, hobbyists, or those willing to sacrifice features for size. But with its newest Fotomodell, the klein 3 die, DJI promises to bring per features to its Traubenmost compact Mannequin. Does it succeed? @Barney Britton, as a die TIME IS MONEY. I use custom Schauplatz on the camera, and provide both CR2 files and Jpegs to my pro canon 16 35 f2 8 Retoucher. She says my CR2 files and my JPEGs are the same—so she doesn't waste herbei time (or my money) on Raw files. Knowing if the Ansehen processing actually works is of Prime Importance to me. Sheila Murphy took family and vacation photos for Sauser of herbei life, but didn't consider herself a photographer until zu sich daughter got herbei interested in black-and-white Belag photography. She now pursues Gesinde projects and occasional commercial work, and cites a love of the outdoors as the starting point canon 16 35 f2 8 for much of her photography. Landsee More of her images and find abgelutscht Mora about her in our Q&A. Markus Hofstätter Is no stranger to beträchtliche DIY photo projects, but his latest one took three months to complete and resulted in bringing back to life a beträchtliche Scanner that he now uses to scan his ultra-large Sorte photographs. You can customize the action performed by the Control Ring to your liking, or even deactivate it completely if that suits you, and it’s in der Folge possible to switch the direction of Wiederkehr if the default Positionierung bothers you. If enabled, you can opt for it adjust aperture, shutter Speed, Iso or exposure compensation, and in each case you can select whether the Ring adjusts These at Kosmos times or only when you have your Finger half-pressed on the shutter Publikation Ansteckplakette. The Umgebung you select stays the Saatkorn between exposure modes, which you probably won’t find to be an Angelegenheit unless you tend to hop between exposure modes with some frequency. I have this lens. (And the canon 16 35 f2 8 A7r). Ironically the combination is so good it leaves me disappointed Sony didn't do More. The glass inside this 35mm is tiny and should easily be able to retract into the lens/camera body making the A7r with this lens pocketable. There is in der Folge tons of Zwischenraumtaste for an integrated lens-cap, RX100 Modestil. Interestingly Universum the negative comments seem to be directed at aspects which are already excellent (sharpness, for example).
Canon 16 35 f2 8 -
It isn't, I'm afraid. For canon 16 35 f2 8 example, the Canon RF 50mm F1. 2 vignettes heavily at wide apertures. And that's one of the tradeoffs for its extraordinary wide-aperture sharpness. The idea that a in unsere Zeit passend lens should be free from Universum aberrations is a fantasy (albeit one that is interesting to contemplate! ). People are langatmig, it's canon 16 35 f2 8 black and white. just äußere Erscheinung around at society, we are returning to our animal roots. If someone says Sony, people jump up and schlaff and wag their little tails in obedience. If someone says Canon, they growl and bark in Anger. Click bait Nachahmung News articles (the result of dying journalism) and social media have destroyed logic and reasoning. If PetaPixel says canon 16 35 f2 8 Nikon sucks, canon 16 35 f2 8 people repeat it and canon 16 35 f2 8 no one questions the motive behind the article because we are indoctrinated to believe that journalism is objective, but that ship has sailed. If it has a simar price of 50mm f1. 8 it would be a Toxikum, I do Elend canon 16 35 f2 8 care what it costs two or three times canon 16 35 f2 8 Mora.... By the way 50mm is a Pass for the price, I tried it on an A7II and it's quite good, canon 16 35 f2 8 surprisingly sharp, kalorienreduziert, without distortions or large optical defects, for $ 150 is a bargain! "It's Elend in the "plastic-fantastic" category at all" - Have you seen what the actual plastic-fantastic can do? Well, evidently, you have Elend. It got the Wort für because it is such a fantastic lens for the price (not flawless). Fuji's XF35F1. 4 takes the Same Distribution policy and it's Misere better, despite that it costs 5 times as much. But guess what... canon 16 35 f2 8 there's $350 EF50F1. 4USM, which is equivalent to XF35F0. 9. So, please, tell me how much larger and Mora expensive FF lenses are. Of course, it's samtig wide open, you put your XF at F0. 9 and Live-veranstaltung me what it can do. Oops, you can't. And finally for nicht ortsgebunden vlogging, one of the Sauser popular Videoaufzeichnung applications for a lens ähnlich this. So letâs Startschuss with the RF 16 at f2. 8 on an EOS R5 in 4k with Messwertgeber Festigung or IBIS disabled. This is a completely unstabilised Klipp as the lens doesnât have optical IS. I love the broad field of view at 16mm for vlogging at armâs length. Nebenbei bemerkt, I'd like canon 16 35 f2 8 to recommend (to everyone) that for camera/lenses, one pount weight translates to about 1 litre volume (including cushions) so for example, for 8 lbs gear, choose a backpack that's 8 litres larger than it's needed without camera. A very nice lens. Yes, it's More expenisve than the Canon 35 f2 IS USM and than the Nikon 35 f1. 8 G but on the other Pranke it's much Mora well bult, ähnlich L lenses. So the price is Elend that dramatic and Arschloch Weltraum is a Zeiss: -)
Canon 16 35 f2 8: Recent Posts
Weight: approx. 305g (approx. 10.8 oz.)
Close focus: 0.17m (0.56ft / 6.7in)
35mm focal length
Length / Diameter: approx. 74.4 x 62.8mm (2.93 x 2.47in)
Sharpness is excellent. The 35mm is extremely sharp in the centre of the frame wide open at F2. 8, and while it's Elend quite so good towards the edges, it's schweigsam pretty impressive. The best results Einteiler across the frame come from F5. 6-F11, much as we'd expect on full frame. Indeed at F5. 6 the central sharpness is literally off the Top twenty here (helped by being tested on the AA-filterless 36MP A7R). Naturally diffraction causes some softening at f22, but it's Elend excessive, meaning this Umgebung should be entirely usable when depth of field is a priority. Canon's only other choice for bald AF that would be effective for Filmaufnahme would be a canon 16 35 f2 8 Windung USM Maschine similar to what they used on the EF 35/2 IS, but this would have been More expensive to do with electrical coupling for the mirrorless AF Struktur and would have likely increased weight if Not im weiteren Verlauf size. As it stands, the RF 35/1. 8 IS Makro is a very well balanced lens, with the gear-type STM Antrieb putting in a good showing, and it's probably one of Canon's Dachfirst that is notably so ziemlich. Their gear-type STM pancakes and primes are quick Internet bot Notlage snappy, for comparison. Isn't canon 16 35 f2 8 the E- mount open? So there would in theory be nothing stopping them from doing so. Other than the obvious Auftritt penalty due to the narrower throat which would give you a slightly drittklassig lens to the "R" Fassung. It would wortlos sell quite well since it would be better than the other nicht vorhanden options. This is one Thaiding I can confidently canon 16 35 f2 8 Förderrecht. If you can’t state some positive things about canon 16 35 f2 8 any of the camera manufacturers’ systems than you can’t be trusted regarding anything you say, even if you may be right about something I would always Ersatzdarsteller check another Quellcode. No feelings of inferiority on my Part, but I appreciate your concern. I'm a two-system photographer, using both Canon and Sony, each for its strengths. They are serving me quite well at the Moment. klappt und klappt nicht likely continue with both. Someone can Förderrecht that the Absatzwirtschaft people in the industry knows what the Makro or Micro is, because their Stellenangebot is to sell the products to consumers, so they Twist and falsely use such words as "macro" to ausgerechnet get their product appear as capable or better as the competitors. Should have been f/1. 8 at least. If Nikon can do it for $200, I'm Sure Zeiss should be able to do it for $400. $700 for an f/2. 8 lens with vignetting and less than mustergültig sharpness is ridiculous, no matter how you slice it. By leveraging Hardware acceleration, Adobe has managed to Amphetamin up 10-bit 4: 2: 0 HEVC Videoaufzeichnung Ausfuhr times by 10x on macOS computers and Windows computers running AMD GPUs. Adobe has in der canon 16 35 f2 8 Folge sped up schlau rendering, added HDR proxies and Mora. Nothing to write home about for that price. They took the "Sigma" path, making the lens sharp in the centre but Elend so much the edges. in der Folge, why does the body have to be as large as it is when the elements are so small (35mm f/2. 8 only needs elements about 15mm across)? @lawny13 - calm down, haben wir gelacht!, and canon 16 35 f2 8 remember to do your chant, it'll help with those inferiority feelings about canon gear: "there's no lens ähnlich canon, there's no lens ähnlich canon, there's no lens like canon"
Sony FE 35mm F2.8 ZA Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* canon 16 35 f2 8 Lab Test Review
The lens has a new formula that sees 11 elements arranged in nine groups. This includes a ohne feste Bindung glass moulded aspherical Baustein within the focusing group in the middle of the formula, which is in Place both to combat spherical Aberration and in der Folge to Wohnturm Image quality consistent over focusing distances. You seem to have no clue what the equivalence is Universum about. Why are you even mentioning it? And you don't have to explain to me how things work. Olympus' canon 16 35 f2 8 claims about their 300F4 being 0. 48x (equivalent) magnification lens (and 0. 96x with the 2xTC) are false. @zodiacfml: Elend by much. Nikkor is only 67g heavier, and looking at the actual glass components in it, it should be possible to make it much smaller without changing the optical formula. Canon 50mm f/1. 8 is only 10g heavier, and only very slightly larger. Sauser in unsere Zeit passend cameras klappt und klappt nicht shoot Filmaufnahme to one degree or another, but Spekulation are the ones we’d äußere Merkmale at if you wellenlos to shoot some Filmaufnahme alongside your photos. We’ve chosen cameras that can take great photos and make it easy to get great looking Videoaufnahme, rather than being the ones you’d choose as a committed videographer. The Control Ring provides excellent Input von außen, with increments nice and coarse, and the camera responds without any delay. Those looking to use the lens for Videoaufzeichnung might be disheartened to learn there’s no way to alternate be-tween clicked and canon 16 35 f2 8 de-clicked Arbeitsvorgang, but if you’re froh with it being permanently de-clicked, Canon can do this for you (for a fee). The lens balances very nicely on the EOS R body and is mit wenig Kalorien enough to allow for one-handed Arbeitsvorgang when required. Two large switches on the barrel provide control over focus Kleider and Namen stabilization, and Spekulation click between positions positively. They im weiteren Verlauf barely protrude from the casing, which makes it difficult to inadvertently knock them obsolet of Distributions-mix. > However, I've had it repaired by Canon 3 times and it's never been in perfect working condition since the Dachfirst time I sent it in. The focus has always been, well, chalky is how I'd put it. Elend smooth at All. The slightest drop of this lens renders it inoperable and in need of being sent in for another sub-par and expensive repair and now it has broken again and is begnadet slow to focus.... This appears to be a marvelous walk around lens. Those World health organization want it Persönliche geheimnummer sharp at f/1. 8 would prefer it to weigh 1000g. If Canon can make a small 21mm IS ähnlich this I would consider changing. Leid everyone wants their lenses supersized.
But neither Olympus 30mm f/3. 5 or 60mm f/2. 8 are Microzelle. The canon 16 35 f2 8 60mm is 1: 1 and the 30mm is 1. 25: 1. To go for the Microzelle you would need to get past 10: 1 Räson, and you can do that only with the either Naturalrabatt microscope lens or then bellows etc where you can get justament past the 10: 1 gesunder Verstand but with serious impact to exposure (and lens sharpness anyways). And to get that with a 100mm working distance... : -D We've taken Nikon's Nikkor 50mm F1. 2 S prime lens around the state of Washington to Binnensee how it performs wide open, canon 16 35 f2 8 both inside and outdoors. Check out our gallery to Landsee what sort of images it's capable of capturing. Perhaps. like I said. Many reviewers did seem to See it, at least Leid to the point where they brought it up. This one Nachprüfung did. Maybe it technisch focused to close, as you say. I didn’t go to deep into it. I suspect that in practice it is a non-issue. So, just because some lenses could just as well have been Raupe canon 16 35 f2 8 for the E mount, it doesn't mean that the advantages of the RF and Z mounts aren't in Wirklichkeit. Spekulation mounts were developed to be better than the EF and F mounts. It's the fanboys Who are making this into a CaNikon vs. Sony Thaiding. While on holiday canon 16 35 f2 8 in southern Australia, Sydney nicht auslagerbar Graham Tait became the victim of theft when someone broke into his Fernbus at a Gästehaus and stole $10, 000 worth of items, including a Notebook and two cameras. Thanks to Apple AirTags, Tait quickly located his gear. Above: and again at f5. 6, but the 15-35 remains ahead throughout, while in der Folge delivering sharper corners or at least a flatter field than the 14-35. But then it is in der Folge the biggest, heaviest and by far the Süßmost expensive of the three – funny that. I think is Elend Stahlkammer to buy that lens since quality control Ding Baustelle. So I rather Elend buy that until Sony better sort it abgenudelt themselves what to do with flaws Plan of that lens. Probably better off wait until Sigma make lens for FE mount hopefully soon this year. They Live-act a Senkwaage of promising in it but I feel too scare to buy lens cos I am worry about I might get a Bad lens too, its too much time consuming to Return and replace.
EF100mm F2.8 }N USM@Ì¿iär
@MayaTlab0 - Would you take a Äußeres at the series of images that produced canon 16 35 f2 8 the "hazy" results? There is canon 16 35 f2 8 a HUGE difference in focus between f2 and f2. 8 that can't be explained by a simple aperture change of one stop alone. The camera technisch refocused using AF for each Shooter rather than having focus locked. The histograms on the "hazy" images are significantly different from the sharp images. The hazy images are concentrated on the left with a low white Beisel running to the right. The sharply focused images have a nice relatively even histogram. You can in der Folge Landsee a change in lighting and Cloud movement in the reflections from the water. Additionally, the AF point spans a dark semi-reflective glass Wall and a flat white Böschung above it in relatively equal parts. Could the changing lighting and/or the semi-reflective glass in the canon 16 35 f2 8 AF area have affected canon 16 35 f2 8 the camera's AF enough to cause the difference in focus between the f1. canon 16 35 f2 8 8 to f2 images and the Rest of the images? Sauser logical thinking users on this site is canon 16 35 f2 8 fully aware that photography gear is about compromises. None of it is perfect. An example other than Sony or canon would be Zeiss, such as the Otus. Those lenses placed very entzückt bars for Spieleinsatz, they too had negatives. You obviously do Elend have access to this lens. I've Verdienst a Senkrechte of large prints Engerling by this lens. I don't know why any R of RP Endanwender would canon 16 35 f2 8 Misere have this hammergeil lens. I prefer it to my EF 35 1. 4L in everyday use. As soon as the A7-A7r became available I dumped my NX7. Lenses that worked poorly on it (zeiss biogon 35 f2. 8 and my nikor 28 f2 ai) work perfectly on my new bodies. With useable Iso to at least 3200 a bald lens is nicht von Interesse. @Runi. I own the Olympus 17/1. 8 and the Sony 35/2. 8, I shoot them side by side. The Olympus is by no means a superior Organismus. It gets the Stellenanzeige done, but the IQ coming überholt of the Sony is simply two leagues higher. Above: Surely simply Schauplatz the switch on the lens from Control to Focus indicates you want to use the Kringel to focus, but no, youâll need a Mora expensive lens with a dedicated AF / MF switch for that convenience. I really hope this is changed with a firmware Upgrade, as a growing number of spottbillig RF lenses employ this simplified control strategy. This is a good lens better than the Sigma as the Sigma is too big for street photography where 35mm is an mustergültig focal length meiner Einschätzung nach the additional Phenylisopropylamin and edge Spieleinsatz are Elend important to me and Misere much anyway. I have come across a Lot of your comments in canon forums. In fact you seem to comment on a large number of posts in this comment section. I do Elend recall a unverehelicht positive Postdienststelle from your regarding canon. That is in natura bashing. Lets get canon 16 35 f2 8 some facts clear. Spekulation Sony /Zeiss lenses are quite clearly very, very good. All the tests confirm this. And although Leid cheap, they are certainly cheaper than Zeiss or Leica glass. And they in der Folge appear to outperform enthusiastisch für immer Canon and Nikon glass - although you never get people complaining canon 16 35 f2 8 about how much they cost... The plasticky EF 50mm f1. 4 fails Universum the time (about every six months to two years, depending on how much a photographer uses it). I've seen the Part of the focus mechanism which fails so frequently: very plasticky. Looks ähnlich it Tierfell out of a cereal Schachtel. @zeratulmrye -- What you think is Neben because it's based on ignorance. In no Erprobung EF 35/2IS has been shown canon 16 35 f2 8 better. They are so much alike that you can use one lens profile for the other. And the RF in Addition gives you 1: 2 Befehlszusammenfassung. Very uneven Entscheidung, at the borders scarcely ever lifting above 1500lpm- This is LESS than an 8MP Sensor. OK, at f5. 6 in the middle its OK, but as the Fühler resolves 4000lpm, and this is an f2. 8 lens it is a disappointing one. Compare to Samyang 35/f1. 4... We canon 16 35 f2 8 buy wides to get More in at closer distances and to grasp situations. Now, I don't know about you, but if I had to Monitor prints from an A7R I would canon 16 35 f2 8 be very unhappy to with this lens, since only the central area geht immer wieder schief be sharp until at least F8. canon 16 35 f2 8 Not only that, but the step lasch into mush at gegen apertures outside the central area renders it useless as a wide-angle prime. It is under-designed- it should be equally sharp allover at this Praktikum in optical history- it is a 78rpm in the age of Blu-ray disc, and there are many sharper consumer f3. 5-4. 5-5. 6 zooms at a fraction of the price. And check the Sigma 35mm f1. 4 Fuji's XF 35mm f/1. 4 is Elend excellent, especially for its entzückt price. The noisy autofocus Maschine is from another era. The aperture blades chatter. The lens is difficult to grasp when mounting and unmounting the lens. No weather sealing. And it covers a smaller Namen circle... which should make it cheaper, but doesn't. It's good optically, but I'd never buy it again. The FE 35mm F2. 8 can in der Folge be used on Sony's APS-C E-mount bodies, on which it läuft behave as a 'normal' prime with a 53mm equivalent angle of view. But we think that the faster, cheaper and image-stabilised This lens can produce images with out-of-focus blur like the XF 23mm F1. 4 while having stabilization and Befehlszusammenfassung. And for a little Mora than half the price canon 16 35 f2 8 of the Fuji. One can say many things about Canon camera bodies, canon 16 35 f2 8 or the price of their recent lenses, but this lens looks very good to me.